Renewal
.:Project Alfheim:.
3x/3x/5x
Server Rating Summary [?]
Server Rating:
Stability
  82%


Availability
  87%


Community Rating:
Friendliness
  67%


Eventfulness
  56%


Game Master Rating:
Friendliness
  67%


Availability
  63%


Helpfulness
  65%


Game-Play Rating:
Economy
  59%


Guild Play
  55%


Class Balance
  69%

Average Rating:
67 / 100
Based on 34 player reviews:
Positive (16)
 47%

Neutral (8)
 24%

Negative (10)
 29%

Since 6 months ago.
Population Median Reference: 200
Donation Level:
Unavailable
  18%

Balanced
  82%

Customization Level:
Occasional
  32%

Extensive
  68%

  RogueRykkard
Played for more than 1 year 2024-03-10
Don't waste your time on this server. 1+ year ago this server was great, but now it's in shambles. No WoE comp, toxic drama between players. Players are unfriendly to new people. GM gives you false hope with the 'updates'. All the time it's 'soon, it takes time' bs. If you have fun with a build get used to it getting nerfed. The gap between new and old players is really big. Economy is all over the place (bad), get used to just raw farm zeny. Don't got the right gear? No party for you. Just dont
Rating: 36
Comment #1
Server
Stability: 5
Availability: 5
Community
Friendliness: 1
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 3
Availability: 2
Helpfulness: 2
Game-play
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 5
Class Balance: 3
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-03-15
You guys really don't give up do you. How many accounts are you guys gonna make and attempt to spread lies. Once again, since the other posts keep getting deleted. Content is still coming. We literally just released a new patch a few days ago with a ton of new content and items aimed specifically at new/mid game players. We're also addressing solo play and new player experience in the next patch. You can check our wiki and check in discord with us if you are skeptical.

  reviewer1234
Played for more than 1 year 2024-03-05
The community is toxic, with lots of petty drama among ppl. Even with fewer players, the lag issue is still there. The economy is a total mess. Whenever there's a balance issue, they just nerf things without much thought. It looks like the only way out of this rut is to bring in a bunch of new players, with updates to freshen things up, but GM seem to have checked out, and all those big plans are just collecting dust. None of the grand plans they talked about have actually been put into action.
Rating: 30
Comment #2
Server
Stability: 2
Availability: 8
Community
Friendliness: 1
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 1
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 1
Game-play
Economy: 1
Guild Competition: 5
Class Balance: 1
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-03-05
we have no reports of lag, so this is either a lie or not being reported. the issue was fixed months ago. secondly, this is lies and misinformation in regards to big plans collecting dust. we have a openly available page of a huge update coming very soon on our wiki as well. for those of you who don't just want to take my word that this blatant misinformation as well. plans are being enacted they just take time.

  gigachadphilo
Played for 6 months 2024-03-04
Update Review: All guilds except one (VH) have left WOE (i.e. guild is getting100m+ zeny per week with 0 competition and farming god items for free). God knows why GM isn't disabling WOE to prevent economy from collapsing. Server still suffers from the same issues of slow updates, zero communication, non-existent events. Still repeating the same mistakes despite multiple players giving feedback on lacklustre community management.
Rating: 29
Comment #3
Server
Stability: 8
Availability: 8
Community
Friendliness: 1
Eventfulness: 1
Game Masters
Friendliness: 1
Availability: 1
Helpfulness: 1
Game-play
Economy: 2
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-03-15
100m + is a joke of an attempt to understand the reality of what the value of said treasure is for the guild in question. guild treasure was also nerfed heavily this patch so this is also nonsense. the drops were completely gutted for the forseeable future.

  rayner_
Played for more than 1 year 2024-02-07
Can't really say that this server is vanilla, it's heavily custom good and bad, hit or miss. lol server has been good until a certain group of people, and their animal leader came. Since then, main GM has mostly catered to their whims. Actual feedback from PLAYERS is read but not really taken seriously. Can't really trust charlie. Random options are just a gimmick at best tbh, just lengthens late game. Good for casual, abhorrent for tryhards. Might as well play somewhere else that's ACTUALLY FUN
Rating: 47
Comment #4
Server
Stability: 8
Availability: 10
Community
Friendliness: 3
Eventfulness: 2
Game Masters
Friendliness: 5
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Game-play
Economy: 3
Guild Competition: 3
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-02-07
Literally just got done implementing 10-15 suggestions from players based on feedback in the suggestions channel and questions/answers. But OK, you do you brother. Not sure what it is with you guys and this bias boogeyman, but I don't cater to anyone and never have. Good luck with your next server!

  fkingjoke
Played for 12 months 2024-01-24
A server that had a brilliant idea but poorly executed. One of the best features and yet poorly managed. The worst part is. Its all friendly, fun and games until you to decide oppose someone in game. You'll get banned when targeting that someone. Management is not corrupt but do have their favorites. Owner is simping. Simping to a horse. What a kcufing joke. Dont join. Just let the server rot.
Rating: 44
Comment #5
Server
Stability: 9
Availability: 9
Community
Friendliness: 2
Eventfulness: 2
Game Masters
Friendliness: 3
Availability: 3
Helpfulness: 5
Game-play
Economy: 1
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 9
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-01-24
Hello! We here at the Project Alfheim staff do not condone harassment of any type towards players or staff members. We ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. Hopefully, you and anyone else reading this can understand. Thanks for your review!

  lina_91
Played for more than 1 year 2024-01-06
Been playing on this server for a while now. PVM Community is always friendly and helpful. There's lots of partys. WoE got changed because 1 person kept complaining to the admin repeatedly. Players get guilt tripped for not being strong enough in WoE. WoE is streamed by the admin, which is nice. But the admin being on voice with an alliance leader during it. Quite questionable
Rating: 37
Comment #6
Server
Stability: 5
Availability: 2
Community
Friendliness: 7
Eventfulness: 1
Game Masters
Friendliness: 5
Availability: 2
Helpfulness: 3
Game-play
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 2
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-01-06
some of these ratings are super arbitrary i notice. server availability a 2? stability 5? we haven't had a crash in quite awhile. I cannot stress enough as I don't know where these hive mind accusations come from, but all WOE decisions are made by me and solely by me. I do not listen to guild leaders or players. I never have. As for my WOE stream, the player helping me out was there purely to add commentary was not participating. Is disgusting that this is being portrayed as something its not

  danigermanxoxo
Played for more than 1 year 2024-01-04
It's a dead server, but of course the server owner will say it's not dead and use a weird @$$ metric of "unique logins". GMs also follow the command of a certain player. If Xellie doesn't like something expect it to be changed on the next day or next patch. Played here over a year and doing RMT without them knowing, just shows how incompetent the GMs in this server.
Rating: 38
Comment #7
Server
Stability: 5
Availability: 5
Community
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 1
Availability: 1
Helpfulness: 1
Game-play
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 5
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-01-05
Server is not dead, unique players is the most accurate reflection of the playerbase. Would you rather I use non-unique as a measure? Include dual clients and mislead players? Pretty silly. And yet another person spreading lies/misinformation about Xellie bias. There is absolutely no bias towards any player, let alone Xellie. Just pure nonsense.

  9ToesBin
Played for 3 months 2024-01-03
Dead Server. Not much activities for new players. The server peaks around 200+ most of them uses multi client and half of them are just sitting in town chatting. The community has a cult-like behavior where they convince new players that mindless grinding is fun while they are doing the end-game content such as boss hunts and dungeon runs. Grinding is not rewarding. Only 2-3 guilds participating in GVG and no battleground. GMs are easily offended so you have to walk on eggshells around them
Rating: 42
Comment #8
Server
Stability: 7
Availability: 9
Community
Friendliness: 3
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 1
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 1
Game-play
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-01-04
Im not sure in what world a server with 750+ unique players is dead, but ok. Some of these other issues you say are subjective, but staff is already on record for having said that we agree that solo play isn't in the best spot and we're going to work on it. we're also working on improving the PVP/GVG experience as well. things take time people.

  Yunalisa
Played for 1 month 2024-01-03
While I appreciate the core gameplay of this server, I've encountered significant issues. The GMs seem unresponsive to player feedback, creating a sense of disconnect. The lack of an installer for the client is a minor but notable inconvenience. Also, the vast power gap between new and veteran players makes progression feel daunting. Lastly, the option system, although a good concept, fails to impact gameplay....no build diversity.
Rating: 35
Comment #9
Server
Stability: 6
Availability: 6
Community
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 1
Availability: 1
Helpfulness: 1
Game-play
Economy: 3
Guild Competition: 5
Class Balance: 2
Owner's reply to this review:
2024-01-04
Some of these are hard to respond to as theyre purely subjective, but the last one is just objectively not true. there's a wide array of build diversity with some builds that are usually not possible in RO becoming meta here. If you weren't able to find a fun build you likely did not experiment enough or ask what other players have done differently. As for feedback to players, I'm not sure what you expect. I've been pretty responsive, it's just adjustments take time.

  TrueNeutralEvGenius
Played for less than 1 month 2023-10-19
It's pre-re, but with some renewal features, skills, etc.. Around 100-200 unique players online, half of them afk, 700 on @at, 500 owned by ~10-30 players. Not very healthy economy, a lot of stuff is not on the market. But the worst part, as usual, are GMs and mod team. The main dev, Charlie, is ok, he puts effort to balance & have fun with his private server, but he delegated power to wrong people, irrational and mentally ill fascists, who are against freedom of speech, logic & common sense.
Rating: 30
Comment #10
Server
Stability: 5
Availability: 5
Community
Friendliness: 3
Eventfulness: 3
Game Masters
Friendliness: 1
Availability: 1
Helpfulness: 1
Game-play
Economy: 3
Guild Competition: 3
Class Balance: 5

«More Low Rate Servers»
back to top