.:NovaRO:.
25x/25x/10x
This server is not available for review, please notify the server owner.
It might be because the server owner has chosen to do so, the server listing become inactive, the server is closed, or due to a violation of our Terms of Service
If you are the server owner and wish to remove this message, you may login to your server owner control panel and click on the toggle link to change the status of this server from 'hidden' to 'show'.
It might be because the server owner has chosen to do so, the server listing become inactive, the server is closed, or due to a violation of our Terms of Service
If you are the server owner and wish to remove this message, you may login to your server owner control panel and click on the toggle link to change the status of this server from 'hidden' to 'show'.
Server Rating Summary
[?]
Server Rating:
Community Rating:
Game Master Rating:
Game-Play Rating:
Stability
91%
Availability
95%
Community Rating:
Friendliness
87%
Eventfulness
88%
Game Master Rating:
Friendliness
88%
Availability
88%
Helpfulness
88%
Game-Play Rating:
Economy
84%
Guild Play
79%
Class Balance
82%
Average Rating:
87 / 100
Population Median Reference:
1118
Donation Level:
Unavailable
3%
Balanced
90%
Imbalance
8%
Customization Level:
Unavailable
5%
Occasional
66%
Extensive
29%
silkroad | Played for 1 month | 2015-05-06 |
I played this server for a few weeks and it seemed pretty good at first. The community for the most part wasn't bad nothing to brag about though kind of dead. The GMs were always helpful to any players that had questions or concerns but the problem was their behavior towards some of the players was very inappropriate. The way they handled certain situations was very immature and unprofessional. Also they made a few questionable updates that tilted the class balance.
Server
Stability: 4
Availability: 8
Stability: 4
Availability: 8
Community
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 2
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 2
Game Masters
Friendliness: 4
Availability: 4
Helpfulness: 6
Friendliness: 4
Availability: 4
Helpfulness: 6
Game-play
Economy: 6
Guild Competition: 2
Class Balance: 1
Economy: 6
Guild Competition: 2
Class Balance: 1
Owner's reply to this review:
2015-05-07
I'm not sure which immature and unprofessional decisions you're referring to, I don't recall us doing anything of the sort. Also, any indirect class balancing that has occurred has been done to more accurately emulate official behavior, which most of the time has to do with fixing bugs.
gankare | Played for 3 months | 2015-05-05 |
After all that went through I see the staff haven't learned from their mistake, I feel sorry for the other guild that suffered the same fate as ours. Incompetent hot headed GMs + lousy community is what this all about, if you try to reason with the GMs then prepare to get banned! your server would have gotten a second chance but I see you and your group of "Powerabuser" still haven't learned, well there you go enjoy a server full of autovend merchants slave buffers. Im not really surprised
Server
Stability: 5
Availability: 5
Stability: 5
Availability: 5
Community
Friendliness: 2
Eventfulness: 5
Friendliness: 2
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 2
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Friendliness: 2
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Game-play
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 5
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2015-05-16
This is getting a little silly. You haven't played since you were banned and you feel the need to "renew" your review? The server has been up for a little over 7 months now and the list of permanently banned players is 4, not counting bots. You wouldn't have gotten yet another chance, you've been permanently banned since December after many "second chances".
Tishbi | Played for 3 months | 2015-05-01 |
Not the most stable server, to be honest. Random disconnects and lag spikes are a norm. Very boring community, GMs weren't that welcoming - they're kinda snobbish (if they were even online), didn't experience that 'homely' feeling. BG was decent and somewhat active at times, I enjoyed features such as automated events.
Server
Stability: 3
Availability: 9
Stability: 3
Availability: 9
Community
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 7
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 7
Game Masters
Friendliness: 4
Availability: 2
Helpfulness: 3
Friendliness: 4
Availability: 2
Helpfulness: 3
Game-play
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 5
Class Balance: 5
Economy: 5
Guild Competition: 5
Class Balance: 5
Owner's reply to this review:
2015-05-01
I'm frankly surprised about this review, as everything mentioned seems to out of the norm from what we usually hear from players. Maybe it was just the perfect storm. It's a shame you weren't able to enjoy the server as much as other people have, and I hope you find a better home. If you're unable to do so, you're always welcome back. :]
WildRose | Played for 1 month | 2015-02-07 |
Generic server that brings nothing to the table, full of the same old bugs and balance issues.
No economy to speak of thanks to extremely common vellum and siege gear as well as monsters and bosses having outdated stats, stuff like variant shoes go for 2-3m at this point.
No competition in pvp, woe and pvm as well since you can just solo everything.
50-60 merchants on average. Staff is fairly clueless and there are currently more reviews than actual players. Common HE bubblegums, token, BBs.
Server
Stability: 8
Availability: 8
Stability: 8
Availability: 8
Community
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 5
Friendliness: 5
Eventfulness: 5
Game Masters
Friendliness: 5
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Friendliness: 5
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Game-play
Economy: 1
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 4
Economy: 1
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 4
Owner's reply to this review:
2015-02-07
After working on a lot of additional custom content and bug fixes, the "brings nothing to the table" comment really insults me. I'm really wondering what the basis for calling the staff clueless is as well, and I can also assure you there are a lot more than 61 people online as of this moment. It just seems to me like you're not a fan of vanilla renewal and would prefer a highly customized server and are giving us a bad review because of it, shifting the blame to other things.
tillytubby | Played for 1 month | 2014-12-09 |
Population is friendly but sensitive. One automated event every x hours. GM friendliness: one kind, one polar opposite. GM availability: without Admin around, other GMs won't show. GM helpfulness: happy to help, but usually you will get "this will come in a future patch" and not see a trace of it weeks later. Economy: poor, cheap end game, Variants ~8m. Guild competition: 2 guilds, no class 3rd WoE. Class balance: Rangers dominate PvE. Bugged skills prevent PvE balance. P2W Cash Shop.
Server
Stability: 10
Availability: 10
Stability: 10
Availability: 10
Community
Friendliness: 7
Eventfulness: 1
Friendliness: 7
Eventfulness: 1
Game Masters
Friendliness: 5
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Friendliness: 5
Availability: 5
Helpfulness: 3
Game-play
Economy: 1
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 1
Economy: 1
Guild Competition: 1
Class Balance: 1
Owner's reply to this review:
2014-12-09
Sadly I went on a trip for a week and it seems the other GMs were not very active while I was away. I don't exactly know what she's referring to regarding bugged skills, or why all of the other random ratings are low. The 3 bad reviews on the page were from three players in the same guild known for attempting to abuse exploits on other servers. Two of these players have been permanently banned due to this same reason. They are also deleting and reposting their reviews on RMS.